“Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators or Representatives, and Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States.”
Received via email, thought I’d share it just as food for thought…
I just saw this on “Turn Maine Blue”.
According to the BDN:
McCain’s campaign announced its committee, Maine Veterans for McCain, through a press release issued Monday. The Obama for America campaign responded by holding an event Wednesday afternoon at Davenport Park in Bangor to announce its equivalent, Maine Veterans for Change.
So, is “Maine Veterans for Change” an official arm of the campaign? Does that mean the campaign endorsed itself? Or did the campaign set up an “un”official “committee” which turned around and endorsed the campaign by which it was established? I’m so confused by all the extravagance and nuance staged to create the illusion of a meaningful election.
A clip from yesterday’s “Hardball”:
At the 6:00 mark, Matthews refers to subscribers of the “New Yorker” magazine as “very sophisticated”. He then goes on to contrast them to the people who will see the cover image on his own network.
Chris: just how unsophisticated are your viewers?
On a side note, “New Yorker” editor David Remnick states (5:38) that the ideas of Obama being “insufficiently patriotic” and his wife being a “60’s style revolutionary” are “nonsense”. Too bad.
Found this on Lew Rockwell today. I was hoping to see V for Vendetta on the list somewhere. Oh well…