Is Rivero this illogical?
A new birther article, with the same old WRH nonsense reasoning why the issue should be ignored.
There are some very clever fakes being floated around to “prove” Obama is not legally eligible to be President.
But does it make any sense?
For this article to be real and for Obama to be born in Indonesia (or Kenya or Mars) means that the entire Democratic National Committee has to be in on the fraud, and that neither Hillary nor McCain’s inevitable investigations of Obama found any of this “evidence.”
Hillary certainly would have used it to get Obama out of the primaries, and McCain would have used it to win the White House.
And without question the DNC would not have gone along with such a fraud because Hillary would have easily beaten McCain.
I don’t know where Obama was born. He won’t be removed because our justice system threw in the towel on the Constitution long ago. Why would it apply the Presidential eligibility provisions against Obama anymore than it applied eminent domain protections in the Kelo case, for example?
That said, Rivero is too smart by half here. Follow the logic out for a moment. If neither McCain nor Hillary raised the birth certificate issue, Rivero insists it must be a fake issue.
Therefore, since Obama never raised issues like Travelgate, Filegate, Chinagate, Vince Foster, etc. to defeat Hillary, they too must be fake issues concocted by some imaginary smear merchants in the shadow.
Obviously McCain was trying to lose when he voted for TARP. The plan to annoint Obama was arranged long ago, for whatever reason, and the people who make Presidents weren’t going to let some silly inconvenience like the Constitution change things.